OTTAWA, Minn. (AP) — Natural gas production is ramping up around the U.S., and that could take some of the wind out of Minnesota’s young wind industry.

Some power companies in the state are looking into natural gas as a more economical way to produce electricity than wind, Minnesota Public Radio reports.

Minnesota is the fourth-largest wind energy producer in the U.S., and the price of wind power is decreasing. Betsy Engelking, of Twin Cities-based Xcel Energy, says that may reflect the industry’s attempt to compete with natural gas.

Following decades of decline, recent years have seen a boost in nationwide demand for natural gas. It’s now at its lowest price in nine years, which makes it more attractive to consumers. It’s used in electricity generation, heating and cooking.

The appetite to extract more natural gas can be seen near the town of Ottawa, in southern Minnesota, where a big hole in the ground shows the progress of mining silica sand. The sand eventually will be used to get natural gas through an operation called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” a big reason the U.S. natural gas production has risen sharply.

Unimin Corp., the company that mines the silica here, is planning to expand production to meet demand.

Floyd Robb, the owner of a power company in North Dakota, says he’s building a natural gas plant in South Dakota. The company made the decision before natural gas prices fell, but if prices remain low, it could mean more plants.

Coal still is the cheapest source of electricity, although natural gas recently came close. Tax and government incentives keep wind energy competitive, which is just slightly more expensive than the other options.

Wind still has its disadvantages, Robb said. While natural gas can produce electricity all the time, wind turbines are dependent on the weather.

Environmentalists condemn fracking, saying it contaminates drinking water. The process involves a large amount of water and potentially-toxic chemicals. The EPA has taken on an in-depth investigation into the issue, and will release its findings in about a year.

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (7)
  1. scott says:

    Ottawa Minnesota? LOL What does this have to do with the story???

  2. don says:

    Its about time!!!!!!!

  3. Craig Mensing says:

    “and the price of wind power is decreasing”, consider the fact that wind power is heavily subsidized by the government so it hasn’t needed to be competitive until not. Just another example of how inefficient the government spending our money really is.

  4. ScottF says:

    Craig, don’t forget that coal and fossil fuels generally are also very heavily subsidized, and in a way that is more invisible. Once we get around to *fully* accounting for the health and environmental costs of mercury and other toxin releases, as well as the marginal cost from releasing carbon dioxide which will eventually flood coastal cities and change climate patterns in ways that later generations will know better than we, *then* we can fairly compare renewables vs. fossil fuels. Until then, it’s not at all clear that allowing companies to burn fossil fuels, reaping the benefits of doing so but exporting some of the costs onto others, is in any sense “efficient.”

  5. ron says:

    THe advent of horizontal drilling and the process of fracturing the shale pockets have us on a course where will be able to telll themiddle east to go pack sand up their camels jockey shorts…

  6. nate says:

    A combination of solar, wind, and geothermal would be much better alternatives to coal than natural gas…yes it’s cheaper but who knows what sort of environmental effects fracking for gas will do…plus all 3 can be setup just about anywhere whereas coal and gas hotspots have to be searched and dug for.

  7. rachat de rachat de credit says:

    Maybe you may want to place a facebook icon to your blog. Just marked down the article, however I had to complete this by hand. Just my suggestion.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE