WASHINGTON (AP) — Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 tax plan ignited plenty of sparks in the Republican presidential debate Tuesday night, as did testy exchanges between Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. In those instances and more, the facts took a bit of a beating.

A look at the accuracy of some of the claims in the Las Vegas debate:


HERMAN CAIN: “It does not raise taxes on those that are making the least.”

THE FACTS: An independent analysis of his tax plan, released Tuesday, concluded otherwise. The Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank, said Cain’s plan would increase taxes on 84 percent of U.S. households, hitting low- and medium-income households the hardest. The analysis said that households making $10,000 to $20,000 would see whopping tax increases averaging $2,705 — an increase of nearly 950 percent.

The rich, however, would get big tax cuts, the analysis said.

Cain’s plan would scrap current taxes on income, payroll, capital gains and corporate profits. He would replace them with a 9 percent tax on income, a 9 percent business tax and a 9 percent national sales tax.

The study is in line with economic theorists — whether on the left or right — who note that sales taxes tend to hit low-income families the hardest because they spend more of their income than wealthier families do.

Unlike most states, Cain’s plan would not exempt food or medicine from sales taxes. Used items, however, would be exempt.

Cain said his plan would create zones where people and businesses could get additional tax deductions, which would reduce taxes for low-income people. The Tax Policy Center said it did not take the zones into account because the Cain campaign did not provide any details on how they would work.


RICK PERRY: “Mitt, you lose all of your standing, from my perspective, because you hired illegals in your home and you knew about it for a year. And the idea that you stand here before us and talk about that you’re strong on immigration is on its face the height of hypocrisy.”

MITT ROMNEY: “I don’t think I’ve ever hired an illegal in my life.”

THE FACTS: The truth is that Romney, former Massachusetts governor, never directly hired an illegal immigrant. But he hired a landscaping company that employed them.

In bringing up the matter, Texas Gov. Perry resurrected a charge that has dogged Romney since his last presidential bid. In 2006, Romney learned that the landscaper of his suburban Boston home had employed illegal immigrants. He gave the company a second chance under the condition that it would no longer employ undocumented workers.

But in 2007, during the height of his first Republican presidential campaign, the same company was caught employing illegal immigrants at Romney’s home. Romney then fired the landscaper.

At the time, and again Tuesday night, Romney said there’s only so much an individual can do when hiring a legitimate company.


ROMNEY to PERRY: “You were the chairman of Al Gore’s campaign.”

THE FACTS: Romney’s claim was misleading, at best. He neglected to mention that Perry’s role in Gore’s failed 1988 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination was limited to Texas. It was also marginal.

Perry was a Democrat serving in the state legislature at the time and had no significant leadership role in Gore’s third-place finish in Texas. He was one of 28 Democratic Texas lawmakers who endorsed Gore. In any event, he was far from being “the chairman” of Gore’s campaign. Perry switched parties in 1989 and successfully ran for state agriculture commissioner as a Republican.


RICK SANTORUM: “(Perry) sent a letter the day of the vote on the floor of the House saying, pass the economic plan. There was only one plan, and that was the plan that was voted on the floor. It was TARP.”

PERRY: “I’m just telling you I know what we sent, I know what the intention was. You can read it any way you want, but the fact of the matter, I wasn’t for TARP, and have talked about it for years since then.”

THE FACTS: In October 2008, Perry appeared to be both for and against the Troubled Asset Relief Program in the same week.

As chairman of the Republican Governors Association, he co-wrote a letter to Congress with his Democratic counterpart that is hard to interpret as anything other than a call to pass the bailout that became known as TARP.

“We strongly urge Congress to leave partisanship at the door and pass an economic recovery package,” said the letter. It was dated Oct. 1, just after the House rejected an initial version of the economic recovery bill. That vote triggered an 800-point drop in the Dow Jones industrial average.

But the next day, Perry was quoted in The Dallas Morning News as saying that while he favored some kind of economic recovery plan to help taxpayers, “in a free-market economy, government should not be in the business of using taxpayer dollars to bail out corporate America.”

Within days, a new version of the bailout was passed by the Senate, then the House, and signed into law by Republican President George W. Bush.


MICHELE BACHMANN: “Even the Obama administration chose to reject part of Obamacare. … Now the administration is arguing with itself.”

THE FACTS: True, the administration is moving to scrap a long-term insurance program that was part of Obama’s health care law. But it would be wrong to take that as a sign the administration is losing faith in the overhaul. Quite the contrary.

Unlike the central provisions of the health care law, the long-term insurance plan, called CLASS, was voluntary. From an accounting viewpoint, that was its fatal weakness.

Without some reason for large numbers of healthy people to sign up, experts warned all along that CLASS would attract too many people in frail health. Rising benefit costs would send premiums spiraling upward. Healthier people would drop out, and eventually taxpayers would have to bail CLASS out.

Obama’s health insurance mandate, requiring nearly everyone to have insurance, protects his overhaul from a similar fate.

“You have to have a broad risk pool,” said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group that advocates cutting the federal deficit. “By mandating coverage, (the health care law) creates a broad risk pool and that makes the system much more sustainable.”


ROMNEY to PERRY: “You probably also ought to tell people that if you look over the last several years, 40 percent, almost half the jobs created in Texas were created for illegal aliens, illegal immigrants.”

THE FACTS: There’s some basis for the assertion that significant numbers of jobs were taken by immigrants, but it’s a stretch to try to pinpoint how many of them may have been in the country illegally.

A September report from the conservative-leaning Center for Immigration Studies concluded that 81 percent of new Texas jobs were taken by newly arrived immigrants, basing that on a government survey used to calculate the unemployment rate. The group also estimated that about half of those jobs were taken by illegal immigrants.

The government survey that is the source of the numbers asks people whether they are foreign or native born, but doesn’t ask about their legal status. The center’s estimate was an extrapolation based on other government estimates of illegal immigrant populations.


BACHMANN: “The biggest problem with this administration and foreign policy is that President Obama is the first president since Israel declared her sovereignty (to) put daylight between the United States and Israel.”

THE FACTS: Israel and the U.S. have had their disagreements and have showed them — often in far starker contrast than today. And the consequences have been far greater, too.

While the Obama administration has criticized Israeli settlement construction on disputed lands, President George H.W. Bush actually punished the Jewish state for the policy by docking housing loan guarantees. President Jimmy Carter experienced tensions with the Israeli government over his public support for a Palestinian homeland, and President Ronald Reagan harshly criticized Israel for a military attack on an Iraqi nuclear plant in the 1980s.

Even in times of war, the U.S. and Israel have differed publicly. The worst disagreement came in 1956 when the United States demanded that Israel, Britain and France end their joint war against Egypt.


Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Stephen Ohlemacher, Jim Drinkard, Bradley Klapper, Steve Peoples, Tom Raum, Alicia Caldwell and Chris Rugaber in Washington and Chris Tomlinson in Austin, Texas, contributed to this report.

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (11)
  1. pathetic to see says:

    These folks can get nasty towards each other but the biigest thing is they all are contorters of facts beyond the “politics as usual” way of DC
    Bachmann proves she’s is a T-Ball player in the Big leagues and truly lost. Paul needs to get a sold consistent hard nosed attitude, and Perry – well, he can crawl under a rock with Bachmann and make creepy talk. These two = monsters of a devil dad
    I may pass or join another party even – this is a sick group. Obama and his mutts have to be smiling

  2. 9-9-9 yep says:


    yep -raises taxes for what, 84% I believe is the latest but if you have some money and making it – well hell now, you get the rewards of even lower taxes.
    You hav eto hand it the Cain – he at least had the nards to just come at you, the 84% of us anyways, and say I intend to stick it further up your rear ends so my top GOP buddy bunch continue to hord more.
    The irony – not even his Rep Tax Slashing brethen are on board. That’s a hoot itself ! 🙂

  3. garbage says:

    the schmucks in this party love to hate. they don’t know anything but hate. and selling their books.
    all about the stage to promote themselves which means money. they even hate you dumb enough to toss them donations and votes. that comes out later.
    the party of stooges, stumps and schmucks and ho’s for the haves. good old america politics

  4. diane says:

    What I saw most in this debate was anger. Anger doesn’t get you anywhere. working together does. What happened to just stating your views? Do we have all the accusing type commercials to look forward to for the next year? No wonder we can’t get anything done in the government. they are all too busy putting each other down and making sure all Americans know just how bad the other person/party is. And how good they are. Well, they are just as bad as the rest. Oh well…. I was hoping for a more mature set of opponents.

    1. Citizen says:

      @diane. Being a gentleman or woman, showing class and maturity, and having some kind of manners gets you nowhere in American society because all those things are viewed as weaknesses. How else do you explain how some Texas redneck like Bush got elected the first time? As people stated, “he a regular guy I can drink with at a bar.” Really. Is t hat what we want in the President of the United States? Someone we can drink with at a bar? Or do we want a true leader with charisma, staying power, intelligence, and morals whom the rest of the world can respect and look up to. People get the government they deserve.

      1. diane says:

        Well, I agree with you to a point, but isn’t it sad when we can’t find anyone with the leadership qualities you describe? Do you watch a scene from the house or senate and see charisma, intelligence and morals? Especially morals. And I would LOVE to say I have some respect for them. At this moment in history, I don’t think I can.

        1. Adults behave like elementary school kids says:

          I doubt anyone has resect for them, or at least can/should. Multiply that by 11x for the views held OUTSIDE the USA…..it’s no wonder we accomplish ZERO, we cannot create a 1 year plan much less a 10 year one, and whether one likes the opposite opinion and party is irrelevant too when it comes to getting policy done. One has to negotiate and work together to a point. Today — zero of this stuff occurs. And it seems zero occurs even withing a parrty.
          A truly pathetic state that this beast called politics has become. It truly is time for a 3rd party to be formed and lead by a true leader. Will the American people push for this is the real question?

      2. dan says:

        I think you have your presidents mixed up. Bush quit drinking years before ever running for president. I think its the all mighty one who started the “Beer Summits”

        1. llp says:

          let’s see what worst a one time beer summit or a quater life as a drunk.

        2. Citizen says:

          @dan. Once again you prove that you cannot read. People said that Bush II was the type of guy they could drink with in a bar. I said NOTHING about his drinking problem–but thanks for reminding us that he had one! Bush II could not pass the background investigation that is required for most federal employees for employment.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

More From WCCO | CBS Minnesota

Good Question
Best Of Minnesota

Watch & Listen LIVE