ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Minnesota’s major political parties took their struggle over redistricting before a special court panel Wednesday, each arguing for a method of redrawing political maps that could help them in future elections.

Arguments included whether the five-judge panel should give more weight to city, county and town boundaries or to so-called “communities of interest” — pockets of ethnic, industrial or demographic overlap, such as largely minority areas.

The new maps are produced every 10 years following the census to make sure congressional and legislative districts have about the same number of people. The court isn’t always the final arbiter, but the political stakes are so high that they have drawn the last few political maps.

The courts are involved this year because Minnesota’s Democratic governor and GOP legislative leaders failed to agree on a plan.

Minnesota’s congressional delegation has four Republicans and four Democrats; both chambers of the Legislature have GOP majorities.

The judges are trying to decide what criteria should guide them before they begin redrawing the maps.

Republican attorney Eric Magnuson told the court it should strive to deliver districts that are roughly equal in population size, don’t have meandering lines and don’t straddle city and county limits very often.

“Objective criteria will aid you in doing your job and will give the public confidence,” Magnuson said, adding that “overly heavy focus on communities of interest is simply too open ended. It allows an after-the-fact justification for any map because you haven’t had objective criteria.”

But Democratic attorney Marc Elias said shifting populations don’t always respect traditional city or county boundaries established decades ago, so other ways of protecting common voter interests must be considered.

“You cannot assume that this is just mechanical process,” he said.

The judges didn’t indicate when they will rule, but new maps must be ready by February so candidates can adjust for the summer primary election and fall general election.

The Legislature will have less than a month to strike a deal with Dayton outside of court when lawmakers convene the 2012 session in January. Asked Wednesday about the prospect for a negotiated agreement on new maps, Gov. Mark Dayton threw out long odds.

“Somewhere between the Vikings winning the division and the Vikings winning the Super Bowl,” he said, aware of the team’s 1-6 start in a division that includes the undefeated Green Bay Packers. “But there’s always hope.”

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (5)
  1. Walter says:

    Judges should not be involved in this.

    They are generally biased, lazy and incompetent.

  2. frozenrunner says:

    @ Walter. If the judges are biased, lazy and incompetennt, what words could possibly be left to describe the legislature on a family website?

  3. Missy says:

    If they are biased, lazy and incompetent, how did they get to be a judge and why aren’t you one? I would think to be a judge you would have to be smart and have some ambition?

  4. I'm Just Sayin' says:

    One more example of the failure of OUR political system. The politicians use the legal process to mediate their disputes instead of civil discourse and some sort of compromise. In this case the republicans were going to draw the lines in their favor, just as the democrats have done for the past 33 years, but the democrats knowing how the game is played by the ruling party, filed a suit. And they filed this suit to stop the republicans from doing what the democrats have done for the past 33 years, before they even started to do it. Is this a dilbert strip or what?

  5. See BS says:

    Article 3 Minnesota State Constitution

    Section 1. DIVISION OF POWERS. The powers of government shall be divided into three distinct departments: legislative, executive and judicial. No person or persons belonging to or constituting one of these departments shall exercise any of the powers properly belonging to either of the others except in the instances expressly provided in this constitution.

    Unless the map drawn by the legislative branch has a problem with districts not equal in size based on population — the Judicial branch has no business drawing election maps in behalf of the State Legislature.

    They were suppose to announce public hearings, but I have a feeling it was only meant for the “League of women voters” The State Legislature reflects the will of the people more than any institution in the State of Minnesota.

    Our Supreme Court is engaged in election fraud again.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

More From WCCO | CBS Minnesota

Good Question
Best Of Minnesota

Watch & Listen LIVE