MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Crimes aren’t solved in an hour like on TV shows. But some killers do give themselves away, if you know where to look.

Three years ago, two teenage boys stabbed Katricia Daniels more than 100 times inside her home in Minneapolis. Her 10-year-old son, Robert, also died after being hit in the head with a television.

Randy Hanson is a real-life Crime Scene Investigator. He was called out to the scene of the crime early in the morning with his partner.

“It was pretty horrific. The two victims had been brutally murdered,” Hanson recalled.

Fifteen years on the job, he said this was one of the worst.

The scene was so bloody it took investigators five days to gather the evidence that would allow them to piece together what happened to Daniels and her son.

“The scene was very extensive and there was a lot of aspects to it,” Hanson said.

They took notes and made drawings at the scene. And they took pictures to highlight evidence.

“So when we’re taking a photograph, you might not see that stain of blood but from a distance. So we put the marker down and it lets us know where that stain of blood came from,” Hanson said.

Investigators had to be careful. Normally, they move a body to the morgue right away but they couldn’t risk it.

“We left Katricia Daniels overnight there because she was in such a confined area,” said Hanson. “When you’re pulling a body out, you’re going to create some sort of disturbance. We didn’t want to lose any evidence.”

There was so much blood, they had to call in a blood spatter expert.

“The expert is going to look at the blood, at the stains, and determine which areas are best to collect,” Hanson said.

Some blood is visible while some is not. So investigators sprayed down the scene with a chemical called Leuco Crystal Violet.

“We use the Leuco Crystal Violet for things where we know there’s blood present but we can’t see it very well. So then we’ll spray down the area and … it binds to the protein in the blood and turns it purple, making it more readily visible,” said Crime Lab Supervisor Shannon Johnson.

Investigators determined Daniels was ambushed in her bedroom.

“They attacked her while she was sleeping,” said Hanson. “There was blood moving from the bedroom to the bathroom. The bathroom was covered in blood.”

She ran to the bathroom to fight off her attackers.

“You can kind of see the toes, big toe. She was in the bathroom with her foot up trying to keep them out,” Hanson said.

Footprints that were found in the boy’s bedroom were pieces to a puzzle.

“You can see more of the impressions of socks in blood, in the carpet,” Hanson said.

And those socks gave investigators some important clues.

“It didn’t seem like somebody broke in and killed these two people,” said Hanson. “Now they didn’t bring a knife, they didn’t bring a weapon. So now we’re starting to tie in a little bit of a tale that there was somebody inside the house and they were probably invited in.”

The killers also left a trail.

“At some point blood was on the shoes, walking into the kitchen with blood on the shoes. It’s not readily visible. We can sort of see a little something but we sprayed the kitchen floors with the LCV,” Hanson said.

Police discover the kitchen is where the attackers found their murder weapons that included a knife and a golf club.

The suspects also left fingerprints on them.

“We did develop finger prints on the door frame in blood. And they were developed using a blood enhancing technique that were identified to the suspects,” Hanson said.

There was another bit of key evidence. Investigators also discovered that Daniels’ cell phone was missing. So they had her cell phone company turn on its GPS. It turned up two blocks from the crime scene.

Police then called the last number on her phone. It was a young woman who led them to her boyfriend. She told police he had blood all over him.

Stafon Edward Thompson and Brian Lee Flowers were convicted of the murders.

During the trial, lawyers used 3D pictures recreated from drawings investigators made when they first got to the scene.

“This is just another tool that we have to help them visualize the scene without having to show them all of the gruesome scene photos,” Johnson said.

While the crime lab doesn’t have equipment as high-tech or as fast as on CSI, they do have amazing tools to solve crimes.

“It makes us feel worthy, on some level, that what we’re doing is actually making a difference,” Hanson said.

Thompson and Flowers appealed their convictions last year. They were denied, so they’re now serving life sentences without parole. Both teenagers were friends of Daniels’ oldest son. Police think they wanted money and her car.

Sonya Goins, Producer
Contact Sonya

Comments (8)
  1. Blake King says:

    What a great article, Sonya! Here’s hoping criminals will beware, and the Law Enforcement people will be appreciated all the more!

    You are a really goodf writer, and know how to say things so they are engaging and clearly understood!

  2. Blake King says:

    Blake here again! Whoops! Esme Murphy wrote this cool article, Sonya–you are lucky to have her, so send the thanks down the pipe to her!

    Our daughter-in-law Sarah works with the Public Relations interface in the MN Board of Corrections, so we really get the importance of drawing the public into the day-to-day operations Law Enforcement executes on our behalf…and people like Esme and Sarah, who can look at the hard stuff because it matters, are critical, as are you. Thank you for your efforts! Blake

  3. kathy says:

    The public should be informed, but at what expense. Words cannot describe the horror I felt while watching the blood spattered room with footprints. This was not another episode of CSI, These were real members of our community. This much detail was unnecessary, irresponsible and cruel. I can only pray that the victims friends and family missed this segment. Also I did not recall getting a warning about the graphic nature of this report prior to it being aired.

    1. bb says:

      Life isn’t pretty, honey. That is the reality of what they do! It is horrible, as I’m sure the family is fully aware.

    2. bb says:

      And there was a warning about graphic images.

    3. em1022 says:

      Really?? The kids and teens are watching movies that are by far more gruesome; this is reality and I think it’s best to know the details rather than turning our backs and being blind to what’s really going on. They wanted to show people the difference between CSI and how it really works…CSI has given people a warped idea of what really happens and the time it takes to really do it. Stop being so sensitive…

      1. justsayiin says:

        i agree; i think this is a really good article and it gives yu and insight as to what real life investigators have to deal with- like previously stated; life is pretty.

        1. justsayiin says:

          **life isn’t pretty

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Watch & Listen LIVE