MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Minnesota officials said Wednesday that the federal government’s decision to remove the region’s gray wolves from the endangered species list may lead to a hunting and trapping season as early as next fall.

Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Landwehr said the agency is “ready and able” to take over management of Minnesota’s wolf population from the federal government.

Minnesota has a stable population of about 3,000 wolves, mostly in northeastern Minnesota, but they range as far south as southern Pine County.

U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., said Minnesota has about double the number of wolves it should have, and they’re killing livestock and pets, so it was time for them to come off the endangered list.

Ed Boggess, the DNR’s fish and wildlife director, said a wolf hunting and trapping season could begin as early as this fall, but details still are being worked out and it might take longer.

The DNR also hasn’t decided yet what total harvest levels would be, but the agency likely will seek to keep wolf numbers above the state’s minimum population goal of 1,600, said Dan Stark, the DNR’s wolf management specialist. There will be a public comment period at some point.

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (7)
  1. Sara says:

    C’mon, Tom Landwehr couldn’t manage his way out of a paper bag.

  2. M Norrie says:


    Was this decision made by the state or the feds?

  3. keel says:

    Yeah…raising cattle in Northern Minnesota is big business. Some of those herds must number in the…10’s. Get real. Be grateful we’re one of the few states to have a stable wolf population. Nothing neater than being in the BWCA and hearing a wolf call in the evening. …or…you could move to New York City.

    1. Stein says:

      And you still will! We just don’t need 5,000 wolves in NE Minnesota alone. I know, I know they say around 3,000 but the DNR knows it’s way more than that. Speak to a conservation officer in the area where these animals prowl, then you might have a clearer picture of what’s going on. Surfing CCO won’t get you informed.

    2. they are neat says:

      And so the loss of stock from a smaller operation is somehow more acceptable? Actually quite the opposite. If the population is healthy enough to allow hunting and trapping, we should indeed be grateful. I know not everyone is a fan of the DNR, but I doubt they will make any decision that would endanger the viability of the population. I have heard them up North when fishing and you are right, it is incredibly neat. We’re lucky to have them in our state.

  4. yahooooo says:

    Hey Wcco – that is a coyote in your pic.

  5. Murph says:

    Not at all unlike the way the GOP wants to manage social security recipients? At least we have some wild partners on the short end of the stick with us! Pawlenty must have been involved in it some way shape or form! Unfortunately he proved with the deer hunt and the old folks euthanasia drive stopped by the MN Supreme court that he is not a worthy human being .Just a typical GOP’er!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE