ST. CLOUD, Minn. (WCCO/AP) — Settlement talks have been set for former St. Cloud police officer who filed a lawsuit alleging the police department discriminated against him because he’s gay.

Sean Lathrop was an officer with St. Cloud’s department from 2006 until 2010. According to the suit, Lathrop was subject to discrimination after a letter was sent to their department in 2009 requesting Lathrop be allowed to work at a booth at the Twin Cities Pride festival.

The City of St. Cloud denies that Lathrop was discriminated against.

U.S. District Judge Donald Frank denied three of the five requests by the city for summary judgment on the lawsuit’s claims, but allowed the requests on the others.

According to the St. Cloud Times, Latrhop’s attorney calls it a “well-reasoned decision.” An attorney representing the city and police department members says she’s confident the facts would support the city if the case goes to trial.

If a settlement can’t be reached next month, the case is expected to go to trial on March 19.

Comments (13)
  1. Gale Dribble says:

    uh, ok.

    1. Josh says:

      LOL Dale – “activist judges” is a term about as stupid as “guestimate.” All judicial decisions are activist in nature, just as an estimate is a form of a guess. And since the judge ruled with him to this point on some of the charges, that means the law is on his side. I wonder if you took 8th grade social studies.

      1. Phid says:

        Not true. “Activist judges” is a term used to refer to judges who use some bad foundation to rule in one way or another. For example, basing a decision on theh way they think popular sentiment leans is *bad* and would be an example of an activist judge.

        1. Rockford says:

          No, activist judges would those that deviate from established law. That sword cuts both ways.

    2. ouch! says:

      cco makes this so easy, I will refrain good luck!!!!

  2. jackactionhero says:

    Without the sarcastic delivery, I agree. In other words, for the less advanced readers, gay citizens of America are subject to the protections of the Constitution and state and local laws just like straight citizens.

    1. lil' jackie says:

      Except that nobody cares what you think.

    2. Mayhem says:

      even special folks like say….jackarsehero…is protected by said Constitution and state and local laws just like straight citizens.

      yaaaaaaaaaaaeeeee, jackarse!!!!

      1. Rockfish says:

        Funny, your older eighth grade brother tell you that one?

  3. Sam says:

    I suggest you actually read the Constitution. There is nothing in it that says the law of the land shall be the Bible.
    All it does is set up a framework of government that is keyed toward protecting the liberty of those within the country.

  4. See BS says:

    These “Activist” Junk lawsuits are depriving the rest of us from life, liberty and the persuit of happiness. We have the right to live in an imperfect world.

    I call these type of lawsuits “Judicial Money Laundering”

    1. Sick and Tired says:

      HERE, HERE. Another term for “Judicial Money Laundering” would be “Legalized theft”.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE