WCCO EYE4 LOGO WCCO Radio wcco-eye-green01, ww color green

Consumer

Tribes Want Federal Regulation Of Internet Gaming

View Comments
(credit: Jupiter Images)

(credit: Jupiter Images)

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up
Today's Most Popular Video
  1. 4 Things To Know From 09/01
  2. Patty Wetterling Asks Son's Abductor 5 Questions
  3. Vacuum Salesman Eats Pasta From Subway Floor
  4. Bar Abilene In Uptown Closes
  5. Viral Vid Of The Day: Stuffed Dog Scares Real Dogs

WASHINGTON (AP) — With some states readying to start online gambling, Native American tribal leaders are calling on the federal government to step in as it did with brick-and-mortar gambling and establish regulations that ensure tribes get a piece of the action without having their revenue taxed and their sovereignty compromised.

A new set of regulations is unlikely before this year’s election, but recent events have given momentum to efforts to launch online gambling in some states. Since a December 2011 Department of Justice opinion that not all Internet gambling is banned by federal law, Delaware has legalized online gambling and Nevada is closing in on making online poker possible. New Jersey too is working to make it a reality.

Some tribes worry that if left to states, they will end up with a patchwork of regulations that aren’t considerate of the relationship Native Americans have with the federal government.

“Tribes should be extremely hesitant to entrust their economic futures to the tender mercies of the 50 states, many of whom are still in financial crises and looking for new sources of revenue,” Bruce “Two Dogs” Bozsum said in testimony prepared for a Senate Indian Affairs Committee hearing on the Issue Thursday. Bozsum is chairman of the Mohegan Tribe of Uncasville, Conn., which has large casino operations.

Bozsum said his tribe has invested a “great deal of time” preparing Internet gambling regulations. “These regulations now stand ready to be implemented, and will meet or exceed the toughest regulations found anywhere in the world, including the new standards recently established in Nevada,” Boszum said.

According to the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, tribal gambling was a more than $27 billion industry in 2011, while commercial gambling was $35.6 billion and worldwide gambling revenues were $30 billion.

Glen Gobin, secretary of the Tulalip Tribal Council, reminded the committee that he previously testified against legalizing Internet gambling. But on Thursday, Gobin said that with states ready to start their own Internet gambling, “tribes must have equal footing to participate.”

Gobin said his tribe, in Tulalip, Wash., plans to move forward as gaming evolves because gambling revenue pays for many of the tribe’s government services. The Tulalip do not have regulations ready because tribes’ participation has not been decided.

“To say we are ready for the full regulatory aspect, we are not, but I have full confidence we have the capabilities,” Gobin said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., have been working on online gambling legislation. Kyl is a previous opponent of online gambling. On Wednesday, the Senate Indian Affairs Committee spelled out how the federal government could regulate online gambling so tribes are protected and included at a meeting of tribal leaders for the National Indian Gaming Association’s Legislative Summit Wednesday.

“We in Congress — and especially on this committee — also have a responsibility to ensure that tribal views and priorities are part of any legislation that could impact tribal gaming,” said Senate Indian Affairs Committee Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii.

Also Thursday, the Senate was debating whether to move forward on cyber security legislation, intended to protect U.S. computer systems and infrastructure from cyber attacks. But if the bill moves forward and ultimately passes the Senate, it still would need to be reconciled with a House version. Little other legislation has moved through Congress, making it more likely that any movement on Internet legislation would happen after elections in the lame-duck session.

(© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,824 other followers