MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — A growing number of Minnesota families are making the decision not to circumcise their baby boy.

But it’s left some parents looking for proper care once they’ve made that choice.

WCCO looked into a controversial topic many believe we should be more comfortable with long before a doctor’s visit.

Admittedly, it’s not a subject Shauna Emery thought she’d be so open to discussing after she and her husband decided not to circumcise Carter three years ago, she said.

“My family gets very uncomfortable when I bring it up,” Emery said. “I was that crazy mom. First pregnancy, first child. I looked into everything.”

The risks of infection, anesthesia and pain caught their attention.

“I talked to a few friends, did the research online and made the decision to keep my son intact,” she said.

Emery now serves as a state representative with Intact Minnesota. The group provides information on research and development. They are now focusing on a concern many families who choose not to circumcise face: Finding the right doctor.

Emery says locating a physician or medical professional who won’t retract is an issue for these families.

HealthPartners Pediatrician Dr. Janelle Keplinger knows the concerns well.

“I feel that circumcision is a family choice,” she said.

While she’s performed hundreds of circumcisions in her 20 years as a pediatrician, she makes it clear that the procedure is considered non-necessary.

But the American Academy of Pediatrics concludes the benefits outweigh the risks. They point to a lower chance of urinary tract infections and some sexually transmitted diseases.

“Some benefits and risks are more significant for different families,” Dr. Keplinger said.

Dr. Keplinger finds the decision is most often guided by race, religion, and region of the country.

Hospitals are not legally required to report the number of circumcisions they perform, but the Centers for Disease Control reported falling numbers in their latest comprehensive survey. Results showed 68.8 percent of males were circumcised in 2009, down from 82.9 percent in 1998.

When it comes to finding a doctor well-versed in proper treatment, Dr. Keplinger says they should all be capable.

“I learned in med school, my pediatric rotation there and my pediatric residency (that) the care of the uncircumcised male is actually quite easy,” Dr. Keplinger said.

Still, she encourages parents to ask questions before their baby boy is born.

Emery has advice for those willing to fully explore this often taboo topic:

“No regrets,” she said.

Here’s a list of pediatricians recommended by patients to care for uncircumcised boys.

Comments (7)
  1. Mark Lyndon says:

    It’s 2018. Why are people still cutting parts off babies’ genitals?

  2. Struggling? the ones who struggle are those victimized by this outdated barbaric practice. Do not retract- clean what is seen.

  3. Reyos Blackwood says:

    It just goes to show how poorly trained american doctors are if they think forced retraction is a good thing, or that cutting off healthy body parts of someone who doesn’t directly consent to it is ethical.

  4. Kyle Chen says:

    Imagine if the headline said “Increasing Number Of Un-mastectomized Females Struggle To Find Care”. We’d think the world had gone mad.

  5. To anyone searching for more info on forced retraction, please read this article! YourWholeBaby.org/forced-retraction. It’s totally safe, healthy, normal, and great to be intact, you just need to be sure not to harm the intact foreskin. Facebook has a great informative group, Your Whole Baby: A Community for Learning.

    There is also a list of some doctors whose patients have found them to be intact-knowledgable – yourwholebaby.org/doctors

    It’s not crazy or trendy to just welcome your baby boy into the world perfect as he was created in the womb. If boys were mean to have foreskins, they would be born with them! 😉

  6. Removing healthy, functional genital tissue from a non-consenting person is not only unethical, but to do it to a child, our most vulnerable, is down right EVIL.

  7. Jason Drew says:

    The AAP are still a major part of the problem, treating foreskin like it’s just a worthless problem. That’s cruel and couldn’t be further from the truth.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.