MINNEAPOLIS (AP) â Minnesota regulators approved the final permit Monday for Enbridge Energyâs Line 3 crude oil pipeline replacement across northern Minnesota, giving the company the green light to begin construction on the $2.6 billion project.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency granted a construction storm water permit for the project, which was the last hurdle that Calgary, Alberta-based Enbridge needed to clear after years of reviews and court battles. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the independent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission gave their final approvals last week.READ MORE: Fight Breaks Out At Eastern Carver Co. School Board Meeting; More Local Officials Resigning
âThis project has had the most extensive review in Minnesota history,â Gov. Tim Walz told reporters. He said his position all along has been that the state needed to follow the regulatory process, the law and the science.
The company and its supporters welcomed the decision, but opponents have vowed to keep up their fight.
âConstruction can now begin,â Enbridge spokeswoman Juli Kellner said in a statement that didnât specify when that would happen.
But Enbridge has signaled that the start could be imminent. The company notified landowners along the route via letters earlier in the month that it expected construction to âstart on approximately November 30.â The company has previously said it expected the work to take about nine months.
âThis is the culmination of six years of evidence and science-based review of the project,â Kellner said. âLine 3 is poised to provide significant economic benefits for counties, small businesses, Native American communities, and union members â bringing 4,200 family-sustaining, mostly local construction jobs, millions of dollars in local spending and additional tax revenues at a time when Northern Minnesota needs it most.â
But two tribes â the Red Lake and White Earth Bands of Chippewa â asked the PUC last week to stay its approval of the project, saying the influx of construction workers would put residents along the route at higher risk of COVID-19. A consolidated appeal by environmental and tribal groups is also pending before the Minnesota Court of Appeals.
Opponents say the project threatens spills in pristine waters where Native Americans harvest wild rice and that the Canadian tar sands oil it plans to carry would aggravate climate change.READ MORE: Homeowners Creeped Out By Boxelder Bug Influx: 'They’re Kind Of Startling'
âItâs unfortunate that Minnesota is issuing permits for an unnecessary tar sands pipeline during a global pandemic that is particularly hitting hard Native and non-native communities and fragile healthcare systems along the route even though the appeals process is still underway,â Winona LaDuke, executive director of Honor the Earth, said in a statement. âThis is just reckless and irresponsible government that will have consequences for all sides.â
Margaret Levin, director of the Minnesota chapter of the Sierra Club, said the approval is âcompletely out of stepâ with the Walz administrationâs stated goals of protecting communities and the environment.
âWe will not allow the stateâs reckless approval of this tar sands pipeline to go unchallenged and urge that any construction be stayed to allow the legal issues â¦ to be fully considered by the courts,â Levin said in a statement.
Enbridge said replacing the deteriorating pipeline, which was built in the 1960s and runs at only half its original capacity, is the best option for protecting the environment while meeting the regionâs energy needs. The company said it has instituted strict coronavirus testing and screening protocols for workers to protect them and surrounding communities.
âThousands of our friends and neighbors across Minnesota look forward to using their construction skills to protect our environment and communities by replacing an existing deteriorating pipeline,â Joel Smith, president of the Minnesota and North Dakota council of the Laborersâ International Union of North America.
Line 3 begins in Alberta, Canada, and clips a corner of North Dakota before crossing Minnesota on its way to Enbridgeâs terminal in Superior, Wisconsin. The replacement segments in Canada, North Dakota and Wisconsin are already complete, leaving only the 337-mile (542-kilometer) stretch in Minnesota. Altogether Enbridge expects to spend $2.9 billion on the U.S. portion.
âThis project has faced years of scrutiny and unprecedented obstruction from Democrats and their allies,â Republican Minnesota House Minority Leader Kurt Daudt, of Crown, said in a statement. But he added that the process âultimatelyâ process worked.
âLetâs get to work on the Line 3 pipeline,â he said.MORE NEWS: Deputy Shoots, Injures Man In Duluth; Investigation Underway
(Â© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)