By Jason DeRusha, WCCO-TV

MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Three years after Minnesota enacted a statewide smoking ban in bars and restaurants, most people are happy with it. More than 70 percent approve of it, in public opinion polls.

Even former smokers approve of it at the Hopkins Tavern.

“It’s really nice that the air is cleaner in here,” said one customer.

“This bar used to stink,” said another.

But after three years without being surrounded by the secondhand smoke, are Minnesotans any healthier?

“Clearly we are,” said Kerri Gordon, senior public affairs manager with ClearWay Minnesota, a non-profit research group dedicated to reducing smoking in Minnesota.

“We know indoor air quality is significantly improved,” added Gordon, noting that there was a dramatic decrease in indoor pollution.

That has been very good news for people with asthma.

They’ve also found improvements in nonsmoking bar and restaurant employees, the group deemed most at risk because of their constant exposure to smoke.

Researchers from the University of Minnesota Cancer Center found nicotine levels in restaurant employees dropped 83 percent when compared to their level before the ban. Another carcinogen declined by 85 percent.

Are people smoking less? According to the American Lung Association in Minnesota, “we used to have 21 percent of adults smoking, now it’s down to about 16,” said Bob Moffitt.

Of course, smoking trends have been declining already, so it’s possible this is a continuation of that trend.

“You bet (the ban) is working. We’ve seen a 15 percent drop in heart attacks since the smoking ban,” said Moffitt, who was referring to American Heart Assocation data that indicates 91,000 Minnesotans got treatment for heart attack in 2007, before the ban. Just two years later, in 2009, 78,000 were treated.

ClearWay Minnesota is in the middle of a research project with Mayo Clinic, looking for evidence of a direct link that less secondhand smoke at bars and restaurants really leads to fewer heart attacks.

So far, lung cancer rates have not declined.

“That’s going to take 10 or 15 years, because you don’t develop lung cancer immediately, that’s a long term exposure,” said Moffitt,

Still, the hope is: “If we make smoking more inconvenient, more people will decide it’s not worth the hassle,” said Moffitt.

WCCO-TV’s Jason DeRusha Reports

Comments (13)
  1. Ben Jameson says:

    “Smoking Band”? Nice editing.

  2. Amanda J says:

    Oh, WCCO. Thanks for reminding me why I watch Kare11.

  3. JL says:

    When will we find kids who can spell and/or find the correct words?

  4. just me says:

    my guess is that it was suppose to say bans rather than band… so if that was the intent, “do” would be correct….

  5. Lew says:

    Is it still Ok to Fart?

  6. Marley says:

    Just sayin’…….is that chick in the picture smokin’ a J? Looks like it!

  7. Nancy Aleshire says:

    Hate smoking, but obesity can still cause heart attacks. Do any WCCO reporters smoke?

  8. Stan says:

    Once again we get a useless editorial on the topic of smoking, where did it mention how many heart attack or cancer victims were smokers? What was the age break-down of these victims. I would guess that most were in the 85+ which had nothing to do with being a smoker. We seem to be bombarded with this useless misinformation constantly. The state spends how many billions a year on smokers ailments? How about just once provide all of the facts pertaining to this topic.

  9. Fascism says:

    I have an IPhone, and I hate how it changes properly spelled words – like if you type “ban” it automatically changes it to band. And then I Have to backspace to correct it, sometimes it will do it more than once.

  10. Bob Moffitt says:

    Thanks for asking me a Good Question, Jason.

  11. gasman says:

    Now let’s run a story about the effect the Ban has had on the local bar. I know of 4 that closed their doors since the Ban was put in place. Do you REALLY go to the Bar as a way to protect your health? I don’t see these same folks out calling for a Ban on drinking. How many people die on the roads due to alcohol related crashes? How many more die from alcohol related illnesses? Was the Ban actually created for “the Employee”???…….or those offended by the act of smoking. Appears to fall to Hypocrisy, does it not?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE