ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — 3M Co. has agreed to pay up to $12 million to settle an age-discrimination lawsuit with as many as 7,000 current and former employees.

The 2004 lawsuit targeted the company’s performance-review system, alleging that older workers were disproportionately downgraded. It also accused the company of favoring younger employees for certain training opportunities that could fast-track them for promotions.

The Maplewood-based industrial company and plaintiffs filed a joint motion Friday for preliminary approval of the settlement.

3M said the proposed settlement was not an admission of liability. Spokeswoman Donna Fleming Runyon said the deal would remove a legal distraction and cap its legal fees.

“We think it’s a reasonable resolution,” she told the St. Paul Pioneer Press. “It will allow the company and our employees to focus on growing our business and serving our customers.”

It’s not clear how much of the money will go to plaintiffs. Their lawyers are seeking up to $6.4 million in expenses and attorneys’ fees.

3M has also reached a settlement on a separate age-discrimination lawsuit that had been filed in San Jose, Calif., in 2009. Terms of that agreement have not been disclosed.

While the company has not commented directly on the amount of either settlement, it referred to both in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing last month as “not material” to its operations or financial condition.

3M has about 80,000 employees worldwide, including about 15,000 in Minnesota.

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments (4)
  1. Nancy Jane says:

    Why go that far, settle for that little ( half of which goes to attorneys), and in the end 3M admits no liability so they can continue their performance review and training selection practices?

  2. We have a WInner! says:

    Once again the Big Corporations WIN, the Lawyers WIN and the little guy gets about 500 bucks to go away. What does 500 do for retirement these days?

  3. Victim Du Jour says:

    You can usually tell age discrimination by job titles. If older more experienced workers have boring pee-on job titles and the younger better looking people have fancy sounding job titles.

    Then you know you are probably working a dead end job.

  4. betty says:

    To all the ex-employees in this suit. When you receive the payout you will be hit with 40 percent tax. I know something like this happened to me years ago. By the time the lawyers, the IRS hawks, came a calling I wsa left with only 55 percent and to top it off wait until you do your taxes!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

More From WCCO | CBS Minnesota

Good Question
Best Of Minnesota

Watch & Listen LIVE