Dayton Calls GOP Meeting ‘Political Stunt’

ST. PAUL (WCCO) — As Minnesota edges closer to a government shutdown, there’s still no progress at the Capitol to fixing the budget. In fact, judging from the rhetoric on Wednesday, it might have gone backwards.

A visibly fired-up Gov. Mark Dayton called the meeting a “political stunt” by Republican lawmakers and said flat out that his commissioners should not attend the meeting.

“(The) commission was setup a few days ago with 13 Republican members and five DFL members,” said Dayton. “I don’t understand why this kind of political stunt was attempted at this stage of the process.”

The meeting was scheduled for 2 p.m., but Dayton never received notification and now won’t allow his budget and tax advisers — including Jim Schowalter and Myron Frans — to go in front of a Republican-led panel and get grilled.

“We’re not going to resolve any of these differences that still exists in a public hearing that has 13 Republicans and five DFLers,” Dayton said. “They’re just going to berate a couple of my commissioners because they won’t do what I said I won’t do for the several weeks.”

The no-show angered GOP leaders who say they passed a balanced budget, without raising taxes.

“Our budget priorities were passed. Whether or not the governor liked them does not mean that we did not do our job,” said House Speaker Kurt Zellers. “We fulfilled our obligation. Our obligation was to pass a balanced budget and present it to the governor.”

Now, Dayton’s proposing they bring in a federal mediator to help the two sides negotiate, even suggesting the two sides bring in two mediators.

“I don’t see anything new. I just see a repetition of the political grandstanding and the continued political theater,” Dayton said.

Dayton says as long as Republicans remain unwilling to budge on tax increases, he doesn’t see how they’ll make any progress.

“I won’t negotiate with myself against my own budget. I won’t negotiate on spending reductions until they’re willing to negotiate on revenue increases. I’ve made that perfectly clear over a month now,” said Dayton. “They may not like the answers but that’s my answer. I don’t know what it is about plain English that they have such a hard time understanding.”

Frustrated Republicans say they can’t negotiate with Dayton because they don’t know what he wants. But if what he wants includes tax hikes in a fragile economy, even a neutral mediator won’t help.

“State government is spending too much and is forecast to spend even more,” said Sen. Amy Koch. “And Minnesota families and Minnesota employers don’t have the money to give.”

In the meantime, Dayton’s been preparing for a government shutdown, which he says he’ll do whatever he can to keep from happening.

Republican lawmakers say they are very disappointed that the commissioners did not show up for the 2 p.m. meeting Thursday. They scheduled another meeting for next week, giving them another opportunity to testify. They also brought up the idea of a possible subpoena.

More from Edgar Linares
  • Zed

    Of course it’s a grandstanding stunt…The GOP on every level from local to the federal is so totally bereft of ideas and morally bankrupt that they can do nothing but posture and bluster…Their only agenda is to destroy the working and middle classes, and eliminate the poor, elderly and sick by letting them die, while enriching themselves and their corporate masters. Shame on anybody that buys into the lies of these snake oil peddlers. Go To Your Room!!!

    • tom

      drink more kool aid, that is what the demorats have been doing, spending us into bankruptcy, sounds more like the governor is on the sauce again, he vetos everything the GOP comes up with. he is the one not working with the GOP, it is either his way or the highway, I had an exwife like that, and I showed her the highway.

      • v

        You’re the one with Kool Aid stained lips.
        Dayton hasn’t come CLOSE to the veto record (set by your golden boy, Pawlenty).
        As far as ‘spending us into bankruptcy… do some fact checking.
        Your ex-wife was the smart one.

      • smart

        Tom = smart like highway

    • Reality

      I really think that we need to tax everyone more. This budget is really all about our morals and takling care of the needy. I for one would rather pay more to have the governments help people than, heaven forbid, I have to help someone myself. What kind of nation would that be?

    • DonVan

      Zed is drinking the Kool Aid for sure. Increasing taxes and spending is the problem NOT the solution. If Minnesota buckles under to the govenor, Wisconsin and other neighbring states wll eat Minnesota’s economic lunch.

      Who is John Gault?

  • GOP 4 Life

    Cut spending!!! Tax increases are not the answer!!! Man I can’t stand Liberals and their bleeding heart philosophy!

    Trust me Dayton, you will have to give in before the mighty GOP!!

    • Tom

      @GOP 4 LIfe

      What would u cut? It’s easy to say it, so be more specific. And look at when we had your T-Paw as Gov did our deficits get bigger or smaller under his “cut cut cut” agenda?

      • tom

        all entitlements to the illegals and everyone that is able to work. if you can work go get a job.

      • just an Average Joe

        It’s real simple. Just roll back the most recent spending increases to where they were before they were increased. Example- Any program that received a spending increase in 2010 that was greater than the rate of inflation should be cut to the level of inflation. Now, what is so difficult about that?

        All more spending does is make more people rely on the government for a handout. A little bit of self-reliability and self-responsibility goes a LONG way.

        Yeh sure, I know there are people out there that need some of these government programs. But you know as well as I do that there are also people on some of these government programs that shouldn’t be on them. Why not put a little more responsibility on the shoulders of the program providers to make sure the money goes ONLY to those that truly NEED it.

        • distracted

          It’s a crying shame to see how the extreme right has turned the middle-class on itself. Now what are they doing while they’ve distracted the electorate? Well of course, they’re stealing all of our money. That’s how corporations have become more powerful than our govt and that’s how the rich got rich. Too many people think they have a path to wealth from the sweat off their brow. If you think you can become a multi-millionaire from hard work then you are seriously delusional.

        • AverageJim

          That’s fine. But let’s treat taxes the same way. Put them back to the way they were for the wealthy in the 1980s and adjust them for inflation. Taxes have done nothing but go down since then for the wealthy. That’s why their % of U.S. wealth has almost doubled since then, vs. everyone else’s that has decreased.

    • David J. Conklin

      How unAmerican and unChristian of you.

      I also note that you have to hide your identity.

    • v

      GOP for Life?
      Another FOX-er who conveniently thinks tax cuts for criminals and starting idiotic wars gets a free pass. Ordered your Palin swimsuit calendar yet?

      • Dillon

        Didn’t Obama get us into the current idiotic war in Libya?

        • smart

          Dillon – try learning to read before forming any thoughts about a subject

      • Good Ol Boy


        There’s a Palin swimsuit calendar??????

        Oh I gotta have it! Got a link???

    • Bruce

      The last time we had a major economic crisis was in the Great Depression of the ’30s, and we got the “New Deal” (heard of it?) This time the Republicans want to give us the “Raw Deal.” If they get their way, the Raw Dealers will go down in history as having made one of the greatest strategic economic blunders in US history, leading to years of economic recession.

      • IwonderIf

        Bruce – Bravo
        You have proven to me that there is hope out there. These neoclassical fools didn’t learn then and it seems like they are never going to learn.. Here is the raw deal boys and girls.. Your microeconomic mind set is not the answer. they need to cut back on spending yes but also raise revenue to counter the revenue cuts that were made with out having a plan in place to cover the shortfall of less monies. The time to cut back on spending was then. Now we are in a pit.. Cutting spending is only one part of the solution
        Stay angry friends

  • Wow

    What prevents having a petition go out to get a tax increase on the wealthy put on the ballot next year?

  • shirley

    Thank God for Governor Dayton who is not allowing the republican’s to play us tax payer’s. They want to give the wealthy their tax breaks in this time of financial crisis, is like telling one of your kids ,,here’s $20.00 go out to a movie & lunch,, and telling the other 2, sorry ,,,need to start cutting back. Republican’s your dealing with tax payers out here who are well educated. Time to catch up with us. Get your heels out of the sand and start listening to what your elected to do negotiate a respectable budget that most of us tax payers can agree with.

    • Brett

      Most of them were elected to not raise taxes. I agree it’s a messy situation but Democrats (myself included) need to stop being so hypocritical about this budget. I voted for Dayton because I am not a Pawlenty fan and though Emmer would be worse. I realize now I should not have been so quick to jump to conclusions.

      • WHAT?????

        Gov Dayton was elected running on a platform of raising taxes on the top 2%. He did not hide this when he was running and said it many times. So you have to believe that is what he wanted and the people of MN did too.

        • Brett

          @ What

          So if Republicans were voted for as denying increases, and Dayton was elected on raising taxes we have a real problem. There has to be some compromise, in the end I think taxes will be increased.

          What do you think?

          • WHAT?????

            I agree with you 100%. I also agree with Dayton on this as he did try to meet the GOP half way with a cut to his tax increase. I just love how everyone is talking about how the GOP was elected and that how Dayton is a fool for wanting to raise taxes. What short memories people have. This is not a secret and just like in WI, people have to remember that when someone campaigns on a point that they will do what they said. This is not as drastic as WI change was and still you have people fighting tooth and nail for something that will never affect them. I do not understand why people have such a big problem with the idea of 2% of people would pay more in taxes when they can afford this and in all stats are not paying the same % as the middle class is. Anyone who argues against the idea that they do pay less right now is either just spewing out lies or is too lazy to look anything up on their own. I say meet half way for bot. Half the tax increase and half the cuts that they want, but look hard into where those cuts are and what they will be taking out.

            • Brett

              I think people forget why they voted for someone. I know I am personally getting tired of the 1. Tax 2. Spend. 3. Deficit? Tax the rich! idea. If we keep looking to that then in the long run there is not a lot of incentive to become successful and rich in MN.

              Very messy situation. As of now, I see the only option is to compromise.

        • tom

          thats because most of the people that voted for him are on the government teet

          • v

            cute little rhetorical statement, tom.
            i pay more in taxes than you make in a year and i voted for him.
            now get the FOX/Beck teet out of your mouth and wake up.

            • Dillon

              I do hope you are voluntarily paying in much more in taxes, you nice rich liberal, but I doubt you are.

          • WHAT?????

            Want to back your statement up with some facts? I forget, people like you would rather just yell random ideas and then call them facts. Although I should not be so quick to judge as you may be one of the people that when asked to give facts or source’s get angry and go on a “liberal” spree that once again accomplishes nothing and makes no sense. Like having an argument with a child, just making up stories as you go to suit your made up, delusional world view.
            Republicans eat babies on the 15th of each July. This started back in 1903 and continues to this day in a secret location code named “the meadows”. See I can make things up too, and they carry just as much weight as your made up stories. Having an opinion is fine, spewing lies and hate is just pathetic and sad.

      • shirley

        Wake up minnesotans ,,all the radical republican’s are concerned about is the wealthy and taking away the middle class’s right’s to negotiate a respectable wage, decent benefits, safety regulations and decent work ethics. also your soc sec,& medicare.What part of this do you not understand? Republicans have dug their heels in long enough , it’s time to step up to the plate .Start earning your salary!

        • Brett


          Can you be more specific on the Republicans taking away those various things. You mentioned saying “What part of this do you not understand”…Can you enlighten me please?

        • Good Ol Boy

          Shirley, you’re burning my eyes by trying to make a word plural by adding an apostrophe and an s to the end.

          Come on!

      • CHris

        Nobody is getting a tax break. The republicans budget is actually an increase in spending from our last budget, just not at the level Dayton wants it to be. The proper analogy is telling your one child who earned $20 that he has to give $5 to your other child who only earned $7. Dayton wants to raise that figure next year from $5 to $7. The republicans are proposing to raise it to $5.50. Either way Dayton wants to redistirbute the wealth.

    • ,

      I’m not sure you understand the uses for a comma.

    • J


      • mark

        shirley-the Democrats have run this state for 40 plus years- they were also in charge under Pawlenty- keep trying to blamme the Republicans-LOL

        • v

          Mark is a glaring example of why we need to increase educational spending.

        • Adam

          I’m confused how anyone can be in charge while they’re under someone. Isn’t the one at the top in charge, as a general rule? But way to use the LOL and spell blame with two m’s. Great way to prove you’re an intelligent political mind.

          • adam is confused.

            nope. The legislature creates the laws. The govenor just signs, or not sign/vetoes them, and enforces the laws. the democrats spent too much, Pawlenty vetoed what he thought would reduce spending he thought was not good and called a tax increase a fee. If it were truely a good spend, the democrat legislature would have been able to override any of Pawlenty’s vetoes.

        • Paul


    • Republicans will lose next year

      Or if you do not listen then you will find yourselves losing your legislative seat next year. The voters are smarter than you give them credit. they will remember those republcian legislators and their refusal to work withthe Gov.

      • tom

        you mean the lush dayton not working with the GOP

        • Mike

          tom, you come across as a person who enjoys throwing cats off bridges when you can’t find a blind person to trip.
          The GOP have not offered one compromise to Gov. Dayton and have pushed an extreme social agenda on top of it. Raise taxes on the upper 2% and the Gov. will be compelled to make cuts.

    • mike


      For being a well educated taxpayer you may want to braush up on your grammar. Your plurals, possessives and contractions make reading your comments very distractive.

  • Roxie

    Oh my Gosh you Liberals just don’t get it. You don’t tax to get more money. That is like saying I am short on money this month so I am going to rob the rich banks. (Who by the way WE bailed out.) You have to cut your spending not steal from other people to make ends meet.

    • Jim

      The answer is obviously to raise taxes AND lower spending. But politicians and partisans such as yourself will never admit that, which is what got us into this mess to begin with. Thanks.

      • Give me liberty

        No the answer is to lower taxes AND lower spending. Lower taxes will generate more economic activity and thus more revenue based on more taxes collected at lower rates. Econ 101. Liberals are morons.

        • Tom

          @Give me liberty

          Post on here any type of proof that lower taxes raises economic activity. Lets see we raised taxes in the 90’s and created 22 million jobs, we cut taxes from 2000 -2008 and created 8 million jobs and the bottom collapsed between 2006 – 2008.

          And what I mean by proof is try to not to mention FOX NEWS as your source.

          • Citizen

            @Tom. The tax rate on the wealthy in the U.S. was at 91% during the Eisenhower administration, and there was a lot of prosperity and expansion of the middle class, the likes of which we have not have since. With each lowering of the tax rate on the wealthy, jobs and prosperity HAVE NOT been created and we have had rolling recessions. Read economic history and do a timeline. It will speak for itself.

            • Jake

              @Citizen. Read Tom’s post one more time. Yep, you are both arguing the same point…details.

              • Citizen

                I KNOW Tom and I are arguing the same point; I supplied the details of the 91% tax on the wealthy during the Eisenhower years. I was around then and there was prosperity and an expanding middle class. The government provides these statistics. How many more details do you want? Are you unable to look up statistics on the IRS website? I can’t provide a doctoral dissertation on U.S. tax policy in this little box.

                • Jake

                  @Citizen. Yes, I don’t you could provide a doctoral dissertation on U.S. tax policy. Neither Tom, nor I requested further information supporting higher taxes for the wealthy as you did illustrate in Eisenhower example. Thus, my point was your comment was helpful, yet essentially superfluous. Also, yes, I am able to look up stats. Though, I do suggest that both Tom and I are concerned that there are indeed others that have little concept about how little taxes the wealthiest citizens in this nation actually pay. The greater or perhaps even equitable taxation of the extremely wealthy (top 2%) has not been shown to eliminate jobs or slow down the economy.

        • Jim

          No. George Bush lowered taxes and he drove the economy into the ditch we’re in now. Where was all that “economic activity” driven by lower taxes when Bush was president? More recently, Obama extended those cuts, so where are the jobs and activity? Lowering taxes when the state is $5 billion in the hole is just about the dumbest idea I’ve heard. Econ 101 says that when you have a money shortfall, the answer is to take in less money? That’s completely absurd.

          Partisans like you are the problem. You’re so ideologically stuck on your side that the other side “are morons.” That’s really helpful. Just stay out of the debate if you can’t behave like an adult.

    • Anita Newgov

      More revenue is not their real intention its just a cover.

      Liberals simply desire to punish those that are successful. Liberals have this belief that it is impossible for most in society to succeed on their own so to make things seem equal, they must punish those that are better off.

      Its really quite sad

      • Jim

        What a stupid comment, Anita. I’m a liberal and I love rich people. Why on earth would I want to punish successful people? For what? Giving me a job? How ridiculous. Stop with the lame stereotypes, it doesn’t help your argument.

        • tom

          no, actually Anita is right

        • Nothing wrong with a tax increase

          With greater wealth comes the responisbility to help the less fortunate.

      • Realist

        Wrong. The “Liberal” expect those that are successful to pay their fair share of taxes. By not requiring them to pay their fair share, it’s the poor and middle-class that get punished.

        • Brett

          I’ve heard this argument before and it’s a good one. However, how do you define “fair share” Flat tax? because there are arguments on how those favor the rich as well.

          What do you think?

      • me

        Again, wrong. We want everyone to pay their fair share. Ten percent of an annual income of $30k is huge compared to ten percent of $300k, just figures, not an actual example. And many corporations don’t pay any tax. None. GE paid nothing last year.

      • Tom


        Who made those people successful especially if they rely on consumers like us for profits? And if they rely on the consumers for their wealth then we either make them profitable or go out of business.

      • Ronald Yunis

        Zero-Sum game. Exactly right, Anita.

      • Carl

        In 1964 the top US marginal tax rate was 90%. And yet our GDP was booming and the wealthiest Americans maintained their wealth.

        Defending the wealthiest 2% from a very modest marginal tax increase is petty to say the least but doing so by stereotyping “liberals” smells of indoctrination. Many of us are successful, by any measure including wealth, but resent the selfish defense of a few who wouldn’t lift a finger to help their hapless defenders.

        That is sad.

    • Tom


      What do you want cut? Schools? Healthcare? Transporation? Seniors? It is easy to say that you want cuts, but why don’t u and others like you be more specific.

      • Give me liberty

        If everything is critical, then straight 5% cut across the board. Everybody can share the pain. Isn’t that the liberal mantra anyway? Or is that just cheap talk to justify the steal and redistribute left agenda?

      • John

        Cut he waste in the spending thats what. If they take a close look at the things we spend money on I’m pretty sure you would find pleny there.

        Nett, our state Gov’t has gotten to big so getting rid of some jobs would save some more money.

        Also, as far as I’m concerned they should ALL be fired. They are paid to do a job and they clearly have not done it. That is what happens in the real world. And when they go back to St Paul to figure it out do not pay them one more penny. They have already been paid to do a job then have not done.

        • Gordon

          Why didn’t Pawlenty do that? His people ran the show for 8 years.

      • Roxie

        3 of them cuts would be nice. Guess which ones. Schools already receive a large amount of my tax money and it seems that they can get a raise every year and it is still not enough. Healthcare could take care of itself if we would be able to shop around for it but guess what the liberals don’t want us doing that. I wonder how come???? Transportation same thing as schools the more you give the more they want. Seniors on the other hand is just liberals talking points. Show me where there is going to be cuts to seniors.

        • Schools districts should be merged

          Roxie, we need to merge school districts. Why do we have to have folks making 6 digit incomes at each school. Merge administrative offices since every thing can be done on a computer. Merge Hopkins and Wazata. Merge Eden Prairie and Edina. You can elimiate plenty of 6 digit incomes that way which will preserve the cash flow for direct educational expenses. How hard would it be to put several districts on the same server and have smaller group of administrators run these districts. I would eliminate the assistant principle position and creat a newer position that would start off at a much lower pay rate. I would also freeze wage increases in all public schools for 5 years .

          • Fired up

            I work in a school district and believe me that the pay raises are not there for the normal person. The only pay raises that were given out the last two years were to the superintendent and administrators, everyone else’s has been frozen. With the cost of everything going up (groceries, gas, school fees for everything the kids pariticipate in) there is no more disposable income in our house. Our politicians need to cut spending, I mean spend the tax payer money like it was coming out of their wallet. The bottom of the tax payers wallets is getting closer. Did you know that even though state workers pay was froze this year our politicians voted themselves a pay raise? Yes they slid that under the radar, they get paid per diem even though they don’t show up for session.

    • me

      You’re assessment is incredibly wrong. If you have a deficit, you cut spending and -and- raise revenue. Under Pawlenty, the revenue was raised via fees and property taxes while nothing was asked of the income of the uber rich. So what if they have to downsize from a new 50 feet boat to a 30 footer. The poor and middle class need relief.

    • Realist

      So it’s OK for the wealthy to not pay their fair share of taxes?

      • Roxie

        Once again I will say why is it a crime to be rich in this country??? And they do pay their fair share of taxes do your research.
        Man, dumb dumb dumb.

        • I hate tea

          Because you are a criminal. If you’re actually rich (my definition is >$10 million in net worth) you cheated, lied or stole to get it. Unless of course it was given to you and that’s about as fair as being born into abject poverty.

          • Jake

            @I hate tea. Generalizations do none of us much good here. While you did specify your personal definition of wealthy, it seems your grasp of how to get there is quite limited. Inheritance, cheating, lying and stealing are only four among many ways in which someone can attain at least $10 million in net worth. Entrepreneurial success, invention, saavy investment, high profile jobs such as entertainment (yes, including sports), and possessing specialized knowledge that has become marketable are all alternative ways that an individual may amass formidable wealth. Hell, build a computer in a garage and then start a company that replicates and extrapolates upon that work. Just a few ideas for your edification, enjoy!

      • get a clue

        The wealthy already pay for more than 50% of the states taxes.

        Realist get your head out of the sand. How much in taxes do you pay a year?

        • richard

          get a clue and others….what percentage do the wealthy actuallpay of their AGI in Mn. taxes???? I read recently that they pay on the order od 10%. I also read that the middle earners pay about 12%. I may be crazy, but I think it would be fair if the top earners paid at least as much as the middle income people. Don’t that seem reasonable? The Gov. is correct about this….time for the wealthy to “pay their fair share”.

        • Paul

          get a clue you need to pull your head out the wealthy DONOT pay 50% of the taxes !

        • facts

          define wealthy so you can back that up with facts

      • go learn something

        Here. Go put your head in the books moron.

        Taxes paid by highest incomes
        •The top 1% pay 22.7% of taxes.
        •The top 10% pay 50% of taxes.
        •The top 20% pay 65.3% of taxes.
        •The top 40% pay 84.3% of taxes.
        Taxes paid by lowest incomes
        •The bottom 20% pay 1.1% of taxes.
        •The bottom 40% pay 6.1% of taxes.

        • Fred Harms

          If the top 1% made 99% of the money is it fair that they pay 1% of the taxes. Its not the amount its the proportion. The top 1% make 40% of all the money in this country. They are getting by cheap.

          Another way of looking at it (which is the way Dems and Republicans always looked at it til Reagan) is that taxes should be progressive because rich people have more discretionary income.
          Careful who you call a moron. What you do not understand my just turn around and bit you in the keister someday.

          • Go cry aboutit

            That is hypothetical.

            I’d still be happy to have a job PERIOD. They worked to be in the position they got themselves into anyway.

            It’s not fair that people sit on the rears, and don’t pay ANYTHING in, and get free money. It’s not fair that there is such a stupid thing as an EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT. There are a lot of things that aren’t fair, but I don’t whine about them!

            Nothing will “BITE”, not bit, me in the keister buddy. Nothing, because I don’t put myself into stupid situations.

            • Jim

              Life isn’t fair, friend. I learned this in preschool.

              ” I don’t whine about them!” LOL. This is quite ironic coming at the end of a post whining about how much taxes poor people pay.

            • WHAT?????

              So to sum this up, they worked for it but Dayton is a trust fund baby that has not worked a day in his life and does not deserve what he has? You Repubs need to get together and get your story right as this does not seem correct. Does anyone know how many people make the wealth that they have and how many of them have old money? I would assume that the majority of it would be old money and they did not work for it just as your friends like to point out every time that there is a story about Dayton. You cannot have it both ways, either they earned it or not and like it or not, Dayton is one of them.

        • Peter

          @ Go learn something. What an appropriate name for you. Statistics, it is called a class. You are looking at taxes paid. Doesn’t mean much. Look at the percentage of income paid in local and state tax.

          On average, Minnesota households paid 11.5 of their incomes in state and local taxes in 2008. That is up a tick from 11.4 percent in 2006, and down considerably from the high of 13.0 percent in 1994.

          The wealthiest ten percent of Minnesota households (those with incomes $129,567 and up) were the only income group that pays a smaller share of their income in total state and local taxes than the statewide average. The wealthiest ten percent of households paid 10.3 percent of their incomes in state and local taxes, and the wealthiest one percent (those with incomes more than $429,354) paid 9.7 percent.

          That is from The Minnesota Tax Incidence study. Little (lot) less biased source than yours.

          • however

            Thats an average.

            What percent doesn’t pay a dime?

            • Peter

              The point would be the percent the top pay is far less than average. Your point would then highlight that the rich are paying far less of their income than you are and your comment would show a lack of understanding of that. There is no one who does not pay any tax as they purchase gas, pay rent (which pays the property tax) and eventually buy something that has sales tax. The article cited total local and state taxes. NOT JUST INCOME TAX.

        • I hate tea

          So what are the salaries of the bottom 40%? Your stats are utterly useless without context.

      • Jim

        I think it’s funny that “conservatives” have no idea what the term “Marxist” means and continue to throw it around in the most inappropriate places. You’re complaining about how our governor, whose family has earned hundreds of millions of dollars through our capitalist system, is out to destroy capitalism and the upper class, of which he is a part. That makes A LOT of sense if you don’t think about it.

    • stace34

      So asking the richest 2% to pay the same percentage of their income in taxes as the rest of us is wrong. By the way Roxie what do we cut? do we cut education so that your property taxes have to increass? Because teh 250% increase wasn’t enough. Do we cut roads? So I best not hear you complain about pot holes or bridges collapsing. Dp we cut health care for the poor? Most of whom are children and then we pay the cost of emergency visits or worse someone who needs a drug to stay stable mentally no longer has access to it.

      • mark

        even if they don’t pay the same rate- they still pay a TON more than the 98%-the MATH doesn’t add up anyway-you CANNOT make up a 5 billion dollar budget deficit off the top 2% ANYWAY-the Democrats really need new talking points

        • Jim

          I’m a Democrat and my talking point is higher taxes and lower spending. It’s the only answer.

          • Frank

            I’m a conservative and I agree with Jim. The sooner we all realize this the better.

            • Hugo Rivera

              I agree with Jim! ordinary people around the world pay taxes. it is truly unfortunate that republicans make taxes an issue!!! Paying taxes should not be a request;it should be a requirement. from a realist perspective….give tax breaks to the middle class, tax breaks for small businesses, create opportunities for the poor, tax the wealthy 2%, end oversees wars, bring troops home, and conserve the environment. And for the record: it is reaganomics and Bushnomics that savagly put the U.S in depth…so dont hate on OBAMA…i know for a fact that there is an underlying racism underneath all opposition to OBAMA’s policies!!!! ps: I cant believe some americans and lawmakers would prefer to fund wars instead of supporting universal health care to all their citizens!!!! truly outrageous!!!

            • mark

              we are already in the top 4 states for taxation- when will we stop??? when we get to #1?? Hey at least we will be #1 in something!!!!
              INSTEAD of this raising taxes BS- or just cuts- we need to re-evaulate what programs are not efficient or feasable-that would be a start
              I was once taught by a wise person-the more money you make-the more money you spend- so if you take that money away from the rich-they won’t spend-so while you are in THEORY raising revenues through income taxes-you will be losing the sales taxes and the income taxes of the workers that those rich people will be laying off!!!

            • Higher taxes and lower spending

              I am an independent and I agree with Jim and Frank. Higher taxes and lower spending

    • The wealthy can afford to pay more

      Dear Roxie, The fall out from the financial institutions was the result of Republican failed policies. We had to bail them out to prevent a much worst economic disastor;ie, soup kitchens, massive foreclosures, failed businesses. the republicans , and I was one of them, are people who lack compassion to help those less fortunate than them. If you are blessed with money you have an obligation to share that money with those less fortunate. To not do so would be heartless.

      • Roxie

        @ The wealthy can afford to pay.
        Oh I am just a middle class worker who is tired of listening to people whine about someone elses money. Were you one that went out and spent out of your means and got caught up in a system that was bound to fail. If so is that everyone elses fault or your own The economy was great and everyone thought they should have a piece of the pie even when they knew they couldn’t afford it and now we are suppose to feel sorry for you. I lived within my means even though I knew I could go out and get more, it was there for the taking. I am tired of people saying we have no compassion for the less fortunate. I help whenever I can and I don’t have much to help with. Keep taking my money in taxes and I can’t do much helping.

      • Ronald Yunis
    • smart

      Roxie – I’m not sure how old you are but obviously you’re young enough that you didn’t get that Civics class that was probably cut out of whatever school district you attended. Likely during the Pawlenty administration since that’s when education started to be under-funded in this state.

    • Jaime

      Roxie, this isn’t a liberal or conservative thing. This is a math thing. Right now tax revenues are at very VERY low levels as a percentage of GDP, while at the same time, costs are rising for many services. If you really cared about the costs and reducing spending, for one thing, you ould allow the government to bargain with drug companies to reduce the cost of drugs in the Medicare part D plan. There are a bunch of intelligent things you can do to save money while still meeting your obligations. But cutting the amount of money that gets funneled to corporations from the government is anathema to corp-Republicans.

      Me? I’m a Ron Paul fan, but I concede the point to MATH at the present that says that we must gut all of the tax loopholes that encourage people to behave in odd ways and just raise revenues while letting the market decide how people spend their money. GUT ALL TAX LOOPHOLES. It raises revenue, and use that revenue to close the deficit, while at the same time, bringing troops home from all over the world and – yes – cut defense spending. Cut across the board, while raising revenue. That is how you meet your financial obligations. We need to:
      1) Cut Defense
      2) Raise the retirement age (SS was made for 65 when people lived to 63).
      3) Bring down the cost of medicine through modification to medicare part D and implementation of the health care reform act.

      That is the big 3 that encompasses most of our government. But I will never be voted into office.

  • Ryan K

    Dayton is by far the biggest cry baby ever. Hey Gov. Dayton why don’t you get your money out of South Dakota and place it here in Minnesota so you can be taxed like you want to do to the rich people. Dayton was the Worse US Senator in US History and is easily becoming the worse Governor ever. Stop trying to increase taxes cut the budget cut welfare and cut your salary since you are one of the richest Minnesotan.

    • Seriously

      Agreed. He sounds like the poopy pants kid on the playground who let any of his friends go to Sam’s birthday party because he wasn’t invited.

      • Art

        The both of you sound like a couple of children. Are either of you bright enough to figure out the welfare portion of the budget was not touched by the GOP. Health care yes, Aid to people who do not work but could , no.

        • Ryan K

          Hmm Art I would say that sounds like welfare to me. Any form of government help is a form of welfare.

          • Art

            The person with cerbral palsy said at the hearing “I did not ask to be this way” That is why it is not welfare. I hope people like you who know absolutely nothing about that side of life get a first person education.

    • Former disgusted Republican

      Dear Ryan K- I disagree with you on that one. As a long time repubican and now newly turned independent I believe that the republican dimwits have an obigation to accept the compromises Gov. Dayton has set forth for a budget settlement. From this point on I will never vote for a candidate who has signed a no tax increase pledge with the Minnesota TAx payers league

  • Tom


    That has been my point for awhile that the poor and middle class conservative buy into the GOP argument that if you raise the tax on the top 2% that some how something bad will happen. If you ask them to show proof they can’t.

    And if you would ask the poor and middle class conservatives if the rich feel just as bad for as you do for them the anwser to that question is NO!

    • Give me liberty


      Get you head out of the clouds or where ever it is at. The top 2% do not earn enough income to be able to balance the budget by taxing them more. The answer is spending cuts.

      What do you call a Republican with his hands held out………..a Rhino.

      • Tom

        Give Me Liberty

        Dayton offered both spending cuts and tax increase. People of MN want a balanced approach. And the GOP’s definition of a balanced approach is to balance the budget on the backs of the lower and middle class so that they can protect the top 2%. Because the top 2% have probably told the GOP you keep protecting us and some day we will reward you, we don’t know when, but we will.

        And I will ask you the samething Give me liberty what would you cut? Education? Transportation? Healthcare? Programs for Seniors?

        • tom

          cut entitlement programs to the illegals and the able bodied working person, tell them to go get a job.

          • jeff

            : flicks back the three pennies in toms face that went towards government checks:

      • Dear give me liberty

        Dear give me liberty,
        Whether you like to hear it or not the Republican party is a party of idiots. They are dumb wusses who have pledge their souls to the wealthiest Minnesotans. They CAN afford paying a little bit more tax if it means not raising property taxes on the majority of minnesotans/ We need compromise to occur between these two parties. the republicans do not know the meaning of the word for they are a bunch of spoiled pre schoolers with their hands on the best toys on the sand box and their refusal to share with the other kids.

        • tom

          sounds like you are waiting on your government check every month

          • v

            And Tom drives a pickup… with a gun rack… flowing mullet… “BACK OFF” mud flaps…and somehow thinks the GOP is gonna invite him to their next gala ball.

            • I hate tea

              Outstanding……..that is by far the funniest comment on this board!

          • jeff

            “don’t spend it all in one place pr*ck!

      • just an Average Joe

        @Tom- “…The top 2% do not earn enough income to be able to balance the budget by taxing them more…”

        Most excellent point. So why don’t the Democrats understand this?

  • Give me liberty

    The only political stunt that is being perpetrated is by Gov. Dayton saying he is compromising. Anyone with an independent thought can see that he asked for the sun and now wants the moon. Back to earth everyone, we have a spending problem. Until Dayton comes to the table with plan to cut the existing budget there has been no compromise. Dayton is a joke.

    • Realist

      We also have a problem with giving the rich too many tax breaks for far too long.

      • Close the tax breaks

        I say CLOSE THE TAX BREAKS! Means test social security so those who receive income from other sources have their soc sec benefits reduced. Take those with chemical dep. or drug problems off o the social security rolls Close any tax breaks that sends american jobs over seas.

  • Give me liberty

    I agree as long as there is a promise to no back pay for those impacted. Otherwise it is just a paid vacation for the hacks that put this clown in office in the first place.

  • Robby

    Kind of hard for a governor to lead when he got 43% of the vote in the last election.

    • Realist

      When making a statement like that, include a source.

  • Molly

    So now this worthless governor wants to call in a mediator to help with the budget.. In other words, he’s admitting he’s not qualified to do the job his dad bought for him. Much like when he was senator. Throw this bum out. How about a recall election?

    • David J. Conklin

      >In other words, he’s admitting he’s not qualified to do the job his dad bought for him.

      Got proof?

      • molly

        The proof is he’s occupying the governor’s mansion. Got Kool-aid?

        • 'cco needs a like button

          haha! love it

  • Brett

    The Republicans said they were unwilling to raise taxes BEFORE they were elected (along with jobs, which is hopefully still coming) so if you want to talk about someone that does not understand plain English, perhaps you should have realized that lawmakers are going to stick to their commitments.

    I am trying to get both perspectives, but I do not understand Dayton’s

    • Jake

      @Brett. Please don’t hold your breath on those jobs. Lower taxes for the “job creators” and they seem just as likely to buy another yacht, a new beach house, or simply hoard it for later. Tax cuts do not equate to job creation. If only the equation were that simple.

      • Ronald Yunis


        Who exactly would build that yacht, beach house, or anything that the “job creators” would decide to buy with their hoards or tax-free-money?


    • Look at all the stupidity!!!

      I seem to remember having this conversation with you before as well. Dayton also stated BEFORE he was elected that he wanted to raise taxes on the top 2%. So your comment about not understanding plain English is looking kind of dumb now as you cannot negate Dayton’s running platform either. This goes both ways and you seem to keep bringing up only 1. It is not hard to understand and I would hope this would be the last time that this would need to be point out to you. You should really find a new talking point or read this a couple of times so this sinks in this time.

  • shame on you

    Go Dayton, about time someone stands up to the not so willing to compromise republicans… shut it down!! if that’s what it takes to make them see what it’s all about. And yes, I was republican but never well be again…idiots you shame me.

    • shame on you

      Stop Dayton, about time the GOP stands up to the not so willing to compromise dems… shut it down!! if that’s what it takes to make them see what it’s all about. And yes, I was dem but never well be again…idiots you shame me.

    • Jim

      Another classy comment from Republicans. Keep it up, you make rational people look good.

  • George Johnston

    I don’t know Guv, it seems quite partison to me.

  • roger

    Are you kidding me? I can’t have it my way so I’m going to shut the state down!
    That goes both ways people! Somehow this isn’t a “party” thing any more, it’s a people thing. NO ONE should be reelected that is serviing right now, not Dayton, not any in the senete, and not any in the house. Elect 1st graders, they caan do better.

  • NoSht

    What did the Republican budget proposal cut and where is Dayton’s budget proposal… He doesent know where or what he wants to spend it on only that he campaigned on raising taxes and thinks it will garner him enough votes to win without election fraud if he should run again.

  • Trudy

    I’m embarrassed to have Dayton as my Governor.

    • Reality Bites

      Could be worse. It could have been Emmer!

      • Reality Check

        Nah, Dayton really was it… But not quite as bad as that moron wrestler… ugh. That was embarrassing.

  • Fred Harms

    Roxie: Liberals figured out how to end a Great Depression that was caused by Republicans and their banks. Liberals figured out how to prevent the second great depression. The bank bailout was designed by W and left a lot to be desired. Liberals bailed out the American Auto makers, who are now still in business and have paid back every penny with interest. Banks aren’t being robbed–they are robbing us and Republicans have successfully blocked meaningful attempts to reregulate them. It is not always wise to cut spending. Dayton is saying that it is time to invest in Minnesota. It is a fiscally conservative idea. Invest. Don’t eat your seed corn Invest.

    • oh please

      I’d love to see a list of the subsidies you receive.

    • more info

      More of that liberal brain washing…

      Liberals didn’t figure out how to prevent, because NOTHING has been done yet.
      Most of this “depression” was the mortgage crisis. Oh you just hear about that turning around so quickly don’t ya… lmao Good job libs! You haven’t done anything but we’ll clap for ya!

      Bet you’d blame the mortgage issue on bush like you libs always do! LOL

      The automakers that can’t sell very well huh?
      Gotta love that Chevy Volt – man that thing has done so well! LMAO!!!!!!!!!

  • Mr. Mustache

    Hey Governor Goofy I just saw some Canucks come across the border with their dog sleds. Time to hide again carp face…

  • Mr. Mustache

    Dear Fred,

    Your comments about the Liberals helping the car industry is correct to one point. They gave them the money. GM only paid back $6 billion of the the $47 billion. Guess who owns GM now? Its called Government Motors. The liberals do more to F up this country than any other political party. Take a look see at the current debt figures and statues that came out over a week ago versus the last administration. You Liberturds always seem to have it wrong.

    • Jake

      @Mr. Mustache. Let’s examine this. Three consecutive years with a federal surplus under the Clinton administration. Largest amount the federal debt had ever been paid down. Then we had eight years of W. This is not difficult. You only have to remember back to the year 2000 when we had a $230 Billion surplus. Fiscal responsibility is everyone’s job. If political wrangling continues and facilitates government shut downs and default on debts then we all will be paying the price of failure to negotiate. When two parties have a complete failure to effectively negotiate, it is their responsibility to seek out assistance with mediation or other alternative options. Keeping the government functioning is certainly worth some compromise from both sides. Time for everyone to step up and work towards resolution.

      The Good Old Days:

    • Ignorance must be bliss

      Mr. Mustache
      It does not help your sides argument by just making things up. 34%of all stats are made up on the spot 63% of the time. Everyone knows that only 18% are correct and 76.3% are wrong but nobody believes it 11% of the time.
      Holds just as much weight as your comment does. Last thing, please stop trying to use cute word play as you are horrible at it. “Liberturds” really? That cannot be the best you can come up with or you might want to be checked for a mental disability as that is not even grade school worthy. I would have accepted poop face before that.

  • Michael

    Dayton is nothing more then a cry baby. This guy does not belong in Office. I love the one that agree with raising taxes on the rich. I learned a long time ago @$#^ rolls down hill. So raising taxes for the rich ..It will only pass them to the middle class as always. As far defect in MN..MN is broke just like most states and fed government. It time to quit raising the defect and live by our means. We need to start by cutting salaries of officials pay. Take away there pork barrel money and the rest expanses money

    • I hate tea

      The problem is “our means” were cut by the Pawlenty administration. Try reinstating the tax cuts he implements in his first term. If I recall correctly, it might zero sum the deficit. If you’re in the top 2% maybe you still have your means but I’m still trying to get mine back from Pawlenty.

    • Ignorance must be bliss

      Who defected to MN? “It time to quit” as well as “expanses money” huh? Calm down and take the time to type so we can understand your point. I would like to know where you are getting the info that we will pay more if the rich are taxed. Repubs love to use this as an excuse but if my memory serves me correctly, Repubs have never done this so how would they know? I understand your idea but then again, the same party that thinks the trickle down affect works and we are still waiting for the info on that as it seems to do nothing but keep the money in the same hands. Last thing I would like to ask is why would we keep giving tax breaks to people that can afford to pay taxes when we are broke? Everyone knows we have no money yet we do not want to get any? The logic of “we are broke so let’s quit our job” seems to be what that idea brings about. Even you yourself said it and then you oppose the idea to raise more funds?!?!?! Baffles the mind as this to me is the same thing as saying that you want some ice cream but do not want to eat it because it is cold.

  • Reality Bites

    The GOP holds a sham meeting to make it look like they care. They don’t. They care about corporate contributions to their campaigns. They care about fooling Joe six-pack into voting for them by raising polarizing issues like gay marriage and voter ID. They care about protecting the top 2% of wage earners in Minnesota. They don’t care that your property taxes skyrocketed under Pawlenty and would gain speed under their current proposal.
    Wake up people. This is about us, not just you.

    • stupid idiot

      Maybe those top 2% provide jobs?


      • Jim

        George Bush lowered taxes for the top 2% as soon as he got into office and Pres. Obama extended those tax cuts. Where are the jobs? Why aren’t the top 2% hiring people with all the extra money they’ve had for the past almost 10 years?

        stupid idiot…LOL…did you intend to name yourself that?

      • True that!

        Not out of their personal income they don’t. Unless they are stupid idiots.

      • Republicans are a bunch of jerks

        What jobs?? Show me the numbers. All I see are the jobs being sent to China, Mexico, Switzerland, or any place else that has lower corporate tax. big business doesn’t care about America. All they care is maximizing profits and padding their bank accounts. they do not care about you . wise up or the republican party is going to take you down.

      • I hate tea

        Tea bag propaganda……….”they’re the job creators”. Good one! The top 2% aren’t stupid enough to risk their wealth with a business that generates jobs. Why would they do that when they can rent/lease an apartment to you?

  • Jim


  • Fred Harms

    I am ready to predict that Governor Mark Dayton will have a place in history as one of Minnesota’s great governors. The man is for the people. His agenda is to return this state to greatness. He is intent on stopping the race to the bottom with Alabama and Mississippi. The man has spine, intelligence, and heart. This is the stuff of greatness.

    • mark

      a spine???? we ARE talking about the guy who shut down his Washington office because of a supposed threat-and NO ONE else did this-LOL
      He seriously has some mental issues- I don’t think being stubborn and not offering counter proposals will show him as a great leader-sorry

    • Patsy

      Fred, are you for real or just having fun with the folks? If you are serious, please read a history book not written by you. The lack of creditbility is shocking.

      • Ignorance must be bliss

        I would say that would go for both of you Patsy as you did not have anything to contribute. At least mark stated some kind of an example on why he disagreed. You did nothing but pull the old “I know you are but what am I”.

    • Gov. Dayton will go down as the best Governor ever!

      Fred, I agree 100% with that prediction. Gov. Dayton isn’t concern about popularity like Gov Pallenty and his slick black hear. He is concern about doing what is right for the majority of Minnesotans.. I dread to think of our state becoming another Mississippi with the worst publci school system in the nation and some of the most illerate young people.

      • Sick of sick of

        Dear Gov. Dayton will go down as the best Governor ever!—

        So did you move to Minnesota right after quitting school in Mississippi?
        Looks and sounds to me that you and Fred may have started smoking “Wacky Tabacky” together while you were in school down there!

  • mark

    what I find HILARIOUS is that Mr Dayton is saying that the Republicans budget meeting is a “political stunt” YET he is running television ads bashing the Republicans & deflecting blame- how EXACTLY is that NOT a “political stunt” as well???? POT-KETTLE-BLACK ring a bell???
    I also find it amusing that this state could get budgets passed with a Republican governor & a DFL legislature-just further proves that Dayton is not flexible.
    Neither side has come up with a counter proposal-now isn’t the time for drawing lines in the sand

    • True that!

      Well, for one thing everything on the TV ads is true. Dayton has offered a compromise and the Regressives have taken their ball and gone home.

      I know that doesn’t set well with the GOP, but then again the truth never has set well with them.

      • mark

        True that- Dayton made ONE proposal- NO COUNTER proposals. And the math just doesn’t add up- you cannot just tax the top 2% and make up a $5 billion deficit-this state needs an audit and they can cut the inefficient programs back or out. We run our education system by no checks and balances also- and look at how that’s working out for us-LOL

        • True that!

          You can LOL all you want. The GOP wouldn’t know how a Republican Democracy works if it bit them in the ass.

          • mark

            I’m a recovered Democrat who saw the light 20 years ago-watch who you say those general statements at

            • mark

              i mean say “to” not at

        • I hate tea

          Are you for real? Do you read at all? First he countered the republican designed budget after vetoing it with 3 billion in new revenue. When the republicans refused very publically to compromise on new revenue, a week later he lowered his proposal to 1.8 billion in new revenue. Maybe your news feed has some kind of right-wing delay of 3 or 4 weeks.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Thursday Night Football

Listen Live