State’s Claim Over Bridge Collapse Can Proceed

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — The Minnesota Supreme Court says the state may seek compensation from a California design firm that tried to block lawsuits over the Minneapolis bridge collapse.

Wednesday’s ruling allows the state’s claim against Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. of Pasadena to proceed.

The Supreme Court says statutes passed in 2008 allow the state to seek reimbursement from parties that may have contributed to the 2007 collapse that killed 13 people and injured 145. A federal investigation found a design flaw was a key cause.

The Supreme Court says the statutes don’t violate Jacobs’ constitutional rights. The state has paid over $37 million to victims, through those statutes and an emergency fund.

Also Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled a lawsuit filed by another firm seeking to share liability with Jacobs could be dismissed.

(© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

  • Ordinary Guy

    If the state won the money and spent it on another public works construction project, who would the bids go to another out-of-state company that doesn’t even employ Minnesotan crews? What’s to prevent it? Crossing our fingers and hoping?

  • See BS

    The State of Minnesota should have replaced that bridge a long time ago. Instead they added lanes to each side and ignored all the rust.

    • Great mentality

      Roger that. Sue the MN State inspectors for being worthless eggheads.

  • Evil2Hope

    Or sue the genius who thought jackhammering up half the bridge and expecting that in rush hour with wind coming down the river that nothing could go wrong.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Thursday Night Football

Listen Live